鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 0 j! t0 e1 N" }( ?
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!# ]8 Y8 v$ b; e- u
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
* w9 N4 B: d# Q7 W9 e8 h& G$ d: _* w' r( g, {
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。3 e5 g8 i8 l+ `& j; T
- i$ P. L% Q- Q) }. h* l6 k
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
3 m' R. j B5 W2 z) H8 }& ]6 V- f% [# J5 V2 B# o
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗? J0 e# ^2 ]: l
9 y! U/ c3 n0 ?1 x: ]另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。+ k# R) ]$ y: g& _0 V
0 h8 z) E0 c+ ~+ D/ r( @& y
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了): W6 X7 g v- _0 k% L
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
" }* N0 q7 x+ d; n. K" d- j& J: [& `4 G4 y& n+ \6 [
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".. U8 [1 Q' W; z
5 e/ R% Z# ~1 f- v1 jBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
, @) a! \& Y- M
; m3 r7 M, E1 Y7 Q6 Z3 I3 d# V! T3 r[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|