鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表
/ M4 {+ K$ S8 w9 Z8 I' u) P, Y楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
8 v2 p5 [; K* j% E$ L; R Kcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... - `7 {) H& {! k0 f/ [' F8 d( J
* P2 [ G) r! t
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。# B" {% E# Q( }' Q. f0 C
9 T* C0 N# e5 z+ v9 |# |安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless." h+ ?4 q) j) v
( x, s- N" J# k
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?9 L# U5 D2 \1 V9 H
7 J9 B' Q- l5 y Y. r6 t. e另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
3 i1 ]: \$ I. H" t
9 ?5 ]' l5 } Y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):' b. c$ P6 V3 Y: v2 e! p, f6 @ i
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.3 g1 f) g; c* j" s
7 x, Q. b) u c9 c! f j# J
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
6 O9 G8 n) v9 g8 }; O' D- k8 {1 ~) o$ z" ]
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
1 C! i% a) ^& r& w! F0 j5 ~ j. g8 K' J9 c. F- |/ K4 _0 l
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|