鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 + J! @: `5 X0 z* G) j H/ A5 Y
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!% m$ A' B3 }1 W, a/ C; |) n
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
) H3 z- J4 N0 @; A- x) h7 ]1 W& ]% d5 a+ Z" D( \1 H1 G
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
9 V, W- P" J- H _
! j" J# J: f" b& X安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
7 r0 v; m; {( K3 }5 Z ~
7 L2 E0 u w# f1 k1 T不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?: }+ C8 t2 ~1 h1 ^
0 g+ p* |) \7 Z4 K. d7 f5 w
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
$ E4 A, D8 [- \ L @( V( p0 s
+ Y! G$ x- w- D关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
: A: D6 p4 F/ u( YYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.4 a+ K; i2 O/ L T
% D/ W- V% F6 t, k2 COr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".% p! I; V! n5 c# r: M$ L
: E" O" O5 q2 `) t
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
3 B9 @3 c) C* q% {
& u3 |7 {' P* I[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|