鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表
8 k0 L( R, b+ d4 \楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!. x% W: n1 N$ l. i: q# L! I7 v
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 1 u; E( A. J* d- E. F
5 [ N% \! E$ {. Z, v" c( W& p
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。! f9 C' e: `' G* X
/ {) B7 k" X" O* L |( w
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
1 L9 T& K. ]% N' S7 R: n( d% T% D( p
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?2 I; k* Q( y, t. p+ v1 o/ G1 w
+ R8 Z, W1 c; e& |! `" z+ M
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。9 v+ O, s* n" f$ i
3 g( o/ ~# |4 w& b. C
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
; U* W6 T$ E& _2 B0 N) M2 hYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
9 O* m3 q0 b: _. L
9 @' ^2 S8 ~% @9 v wOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
+ c; q5 i1 c4 _4 g% v2 d1 x4 M k2 @6 ^6 c
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.- g' D3 e& q) V- ?. h- Y/ H* H
' ^1 d# d9 {. }$ {& _, o[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|