鲜花( 0) 鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ' v1 ~; a" q; m: C9 ~9 ?+ Q- U
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
' W5 P( x7 U: N, h+ Kcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... * ]4 N: N6 B. Y7 A; [1 U) B
5 r' ^3 w1 b$ W+ L. p+ e7 S. w
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
/ j' V+ l6 ^; Y5 q1 ]
* M, d3 c8 z" g安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.+ f5 h h- `1 y$ y* p- I( r. g
. R; G, W) Y+ W* V7 W$ x8 p不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?/ } A- M. T, ?( z) o4 N
- N, e2 v0 F/ [! \- b另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
! O2 O6 t, O$ Q1 v' r% W: N% o
! q/ H& d& L6 D' X8 Y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):$ W: ?8 P) A X! k# @4 k3 Z
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
3 @- y3 R+ O1 V M- h. c/ V
3 H0 m% O6 ]) D% E- iOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".3 x$ B; ~! A* y
0 u# c, S0 x0 _9 U% _' j7 b( EBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
/ a. s: |4 t) W: H% R, _& K; u, p1 I/ e8 o$ l9 v2 e" Z7 U
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|